Tulsa University vs. Furman

Comparable Facts

Compare University of Tulsa in Tulsa, OK with Furman University in Greenville, SC on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

University of Tulsa is larger than Furman based on total student enrollment (3,914 students vs. 2,554 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• University of Tulsa is located in Tulsa, OK (Large City setting); Furman University is in Greenville, SC (Large Suburban setting).
• University of Tulsa is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. Furman University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: University of Tulsa 10:1; Furman University 10:1.

Tulsa University vs. Furman Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Tulsa University or Furman? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at University of Tulsa than Furman ($13,095 vs. $34,086).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at University of Tulsa are 26.6% lower than at Furman University ($12,108 vs. $16,504).
• Furman University is 19.4% more expensive for in-state tuition than Tulsa University (about $9,709 more per year; $59,770.00 vs. $50,061.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 19.4% higher at Furman than at University of Tulsa (about $9,709 more per year; $59,770.00 vs. $50,061.00).
• The same share of students receive grant aid at University of Tulsa as at Furman University (100% vs. 100%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by University of Tulsa students is 21.4% larger than aid received by Furman University students ($51,968 vs. $42,811).

Tulsa University vs. Furman Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Tulsa University or Furman? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Furman and Tulsa University.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at University of Tulsa (1380) is 30 points higher than at Furman (1350).
• Incoming Furman students have a 1 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (30 vs. 29 at Tulsa University).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: University of Tulsa 1223/1530; Furman University 1260/1430.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: University of Tulsa 25/34; Furman University 28/32.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Tulsa University - Test optional; Furman - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Furman Jan 15, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Tulsa University students have a 0.36 point higher average high school GPA (3.97) than students at Furman (3.61).
• Tulsa University has a higher acceptance rate (61.5%) than Furman (42.9%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 23.3% at Tulsa University vs. 13.1% at Furman.

Tulsa University vs. Furman Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Tulsa University and Furman? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Furman University's six-year graduation rate (87%) is higher than University of Tulsa's (68%).
• Graduates from University of Tulsa earn a median of about $4,900 more per year than Furman graduates about ten years after starting college ($59,200 vs. $54,300), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Furman University graduates have a $1,543 lower median loan debt than Tulsa University graduates ($25,443 vs. $26,986).
• Among borrowers, Furman graduates have an estimated $16 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Tulsa University graduates ($263 vs. $279).
• More Furman graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Tulsa University students, three years after graduation. (82% vs. 73%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.