Texas A & M International University vs. UT-Pan American

Comparable Facts

Compare Texas A & M International University in Laredo, TX with The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley in Edinburg, TX on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley is larger than Texas A & M International University based on total student enrollment (33,881 students vs. 8,991 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Texas A & M International University is located in Laredo, TX (Rural Fringe setting); The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley is in Edinburg, TX (Small City setting).
• Texas A & M International University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Texas A & M International University 21:1; The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley 20:1.

Texas A & M International University vs. UT-Pan American Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Texas A & M International University or UT-Pan American? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley than Texas A & M International University ($5,282 vs. $5,644).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley are 10.1% lower than at Texas A & M International University ($9,728 vs. $10,826).
• The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley is 26.5% more expensive for in-state tuition than Texas A & M International University (about $2,093 more per year; $9,987.00 vs. $7,894.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 1.9% higher at UT-Pan American than at Texas A & M International University (about $373 more per year; $19,827.00 vs. $19,454.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Texas A & M International University than at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (99% vs. 93%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley students is 3.4% larger than aid received by Texas A & M International University students ($11,663 vs. $11,276).

Texas A & M International University vs. UT-Pan American Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Texas A & M International University or UT-Pan American? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between UT-Pan American and Texas A & M International University.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Texas A & M International University (990) is the same as at UT-Pan American (990).
• Incoming Texas A & M International University students have a 1 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (19 vs. 18 at UT-Pan American).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Texas A & M International University 890/1090; The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley 880/1090.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Texas A & M International University 16/22; The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley 15/21.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Texas A & M International University - Required; UT-Pan American - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: UT-Pan American Jul 1, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Texas A & M International University students have a 0.54 point higher average high school GPA (3.7) than students at UT-Pan American (3.16).
• UT-Pan American has a higher acceptance rate (94.2%) than Texas A & M International University (44.4%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 36.1% at Texas A & M International University vs. 40.5% at UT-Pan American.

Texas A & M International University vs. UT-Pan American Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Texas A & M International University and UT-Pan American? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• The graduation rate at Texas A & M International University is the same as at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (42% vs. 42%).
• Graduates from Texas A & M International University earn a median of about $3,300 more per year than UT-Pan American graduates about ten years after starting college ($45,200 vs. $41,900), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley graduates have a $4,267 lower median loan debt than Texas A & M International University graduates ($10,539 vs. $14,806).
• Among borrowers, UT-Pan American graduates have an estimated $45 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Texas A & M International University graduates ($108 vs. $153).
• More UT-Pan American graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Texas A & M International University students, three years after graduation. (51% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.