Shorter vs. MUW

Comparable Facts

Compare Shorter University in Rome, GA with Mississippi University for Women in Columbus, MS on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Mississippi University for Women is larger than Shorter based on total student enrollment (2,193 students vs. 1,318 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Shorter University is located in Rome, GA (Small City setting); Mississippi University for Women is in Columbus, MS (Remote Town setting).
• Shorter University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. Mississippi University for Women is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Shorter University 14:1; Mississippi University for Women 10:1.

Shorter vs. MUW Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Shorter or MUW? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Mississippi University for Women than Shorter ($12,487 vs. $16,821).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Mississippi University for Women are 13.6% lower than at Shorter University ($8,572 vs. $9,920).
• Shorter University is 190% more expensive for in-state tuition than MUW (about $16,138 more per year; $24,630.00 vs. $8,492.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 190% higher at Shorter than at Mississippi University for Women (about $16,138 more per year; $24,630.00 vs. $8,492.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Shorter University than at Mississippi University for Women (100% vs. 99%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Shorter University students is 95.8% larger than aid received by Mississippi University for Women students ($18,862 vs. $9,635).

Shorter vs. MUW Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Shorter or MUW? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between MUW and Shorter.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Shorter University (1120) is 100 points higher than at MUW (1020).
• Incoming Shorter students have the same typical ACT composite (median estimate; 21) as students at MUW (21).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Shorter University 1040/1200; Mississippi University for Women 850/1180.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Shorter University 18/25; Mississippi University for Women 18/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Shorter - Test optional; MUW - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Shorter Aug 25, 2027.
• Accepted freshman MUW students have a 0.24 point higher average high school GPA (3.49) than students at Shorter (3.25).
• Shorter has a higher acceptance rate (96.5%) than MUW (90.3%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.5% at Shorter vs. 34.6% at MUW.

Shorter vs. MUW Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Shorter and MUW? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Shorter University's six-year graduation rate (47%) is higher than Mississippi University for Women's (39%).
• Graduates from Shorter University earn a median of about $11,500 more per year than MUW graduates about ten years after starting college ($49,300 vs. $37,800), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Mississippi University for Women graduates have a $13,418 lower median loan debt than Shorter graduates ($15,000 vs. $28,418).
• Among borrowers, MUW graduates have an estimated $138 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Shorter graduates ($155 vs. $293).
• More MUW graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Shorter students, three years after graduation. (57% vs. 38%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.