MUW vs. UT Martin

Deciding between Mississippi University for Women and The University of Tennessee Martin? The table below shows tuition, aid, admissions, and outcomes side by side. Data comes from public sources across more than 3,000 U.S. colleges and universities. No account is required.

Mississippi University for Women

Frequently compared to these colleges. Click a college to add to the comparison. 

  • Overview

  • Location
  • MUW Columbus, MS
  • UT Martin Martin, TN
  • Setting
  • MUW Remote Town
  • UT Martin Remote Town
  • Total enrollment
  • MUW 2,193
  • UT Martin 7,499
  • Type
  • MUW Public 4 Year
  • UT Martin Public 4 Year
  • National Ranking
  • MUW #729
  • UT Martin #803
  • Religious Affiliation
  • MUW -
  • UT Martin -
  • Status
  • MUW Non-profit
  • UT Martin Non-profit
  • Team Colors
  • MUW
  • UT Martin
  • Cost

  • Tuition (In State)
  • MUW $8,492
  • UT Martin $10,560
  • Tuition (Out of State)
  • MUW $8,492
  • UT Martin $16,600
  • Room & Board
  • MUW $8,572
  • UT Martin $7,544
  • Average Net Price
  • MUW $12,487
  • UT Martin $11,955
  • Average Grant Aid
  • MUW $9,635
  • UT Martin $10,861
  • % Receiving Grant Aid
  • MUW 99%
  • UT Martin 98%
  • Admissions

  • Applied
  • MUW 557
  • UT Martin 6,077
  • Admitted
  • MUW 503
  • UT Martin 5,360
  • Acceptance Rate
  • MUW 90.3%
  • UT Martin 88.2%
  • Enrolled
  • MUW 34.6%
  • UT Martin 22.8%
  • Typical SAT score
  • MUW 1020
  • UT Martin 1090
  • Typical ACT score
  • MUW 21
  • UT Martin 22
  • Average High School GPA
  • MUW 3.49
  • UT Martin 3.6
  • Typical High School Grades
  • MUW B+
  • UT Martin A-
  • Admissions Standards
  • MUW Very Easy
  • UT Martin Easy
  • Applicant Competition
  • MUW
  • UT Martin
  • ACT Range
  • MUW 18/24
  • UT Martin 19/25
  • SAT Range
  • MUW 850/1180
  • UT Martin 970/1210
  • Submit Test Scores
  • MUW Test optional
  • UT Martin Required
  • Application Deadline
  • MUW
  • UT Martin
  • Academics

  • Student to Faculty Ratio
  • MUW 10:1
  • UT Martin 16:1
  • Popular Majors
  • MUW
    • Health Professions (42%)
    • Business (10%)
    • Education (10%)
    • Liberal Arts and Humanities (10%)
    • Psychology (5%)
  • UT Martin
    • Business (17%)
    • Education (14%)
    • General Studies (13%)
    • Recreation, Leisure and Fitness Studies (8%)
    • Agriculture (7%)
  • Outcomes

  • Graduation Rate
  • MUW 39%
  • UT Martin 48%
  • Median Earnings (After 10 years)
  • MUW $37,800
  • UT Martin $39,100
  • Making Student Loan Payments
  • MUW 57%
  • UT Martin 54%
  • Median Student Loan Debt
  • MUW $15,000
  • UT Martin $23,500
  • Median Loan Payment
  • MUW $155
  • UT Martin $242
  • Diversity

  • % Men
  • MUW 23%
  • UT Martin 37%
  • % Women
  • MUW 77%
  • UT Martin 63%
  • Racial Diversity
  • MUW Medium
  • UT Martin Low
  • HBCU
  • MUW No
  • UT Martin No
  • % White
  • MUW 57%
  • UT Martin 77%
  • % Asian
  • MUW 0%
  • UT Martin 1%
  • % Black
  • MUW 37%
  • UT Martin 15%
  • % Hispanic
  • MUW 0%
  • UT Martin 2%
  • % Native American
  • MUW 0%
  • UT Martin 0%
  • % Pacific Islander
  • MUW 0%
  • UT Martin 0%
  • % Two or More Races
  • MUW 0%
  • UT Martin 2%
  • % International
  • MUW 4%
  • UT Martin 3%
  • % Unknown Race
  • MUW 0%
  • UT Martin 0%
  • Students

  • % In-State
  • MUW 83%
  • UT Martin 89%
  • % Out-of-State
  • MUW 17%
  • UT Martin 9%
  • Campus

  • Campus Housing
  • MUW Yes
  • UT Martin Yes
  • Freshman Dorm Required
  • MUW No
  • UT Martin No
  • Meal Plan
  • MUW Yes
  • UT Martin Yes
  • Weekend/Evening Classes
  • MUW Yes
  • UT Martin No
  • Daycare Facility
  • MUW Yes
  • UT Martin Yes

Comparable Facts

Compare Mississippi University for Women in Columbus, MS with The University of Tennessee Martin in Martin, TN on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

The University of Tennessee Martin is larger than MUW based on total student enrollment (7,499 students vs. 2,193 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

  • Mississippi University for Women is located in Columbus, MS (Remote Town setting); The University of Tennessee Martin is in Martin, TN (Remote Town setting).
  • Mississippi University for Women is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. The University of Tennessee Martin is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
  • Student-to-faculty ratio: Mississippi University for Women 10:1; The University of Tennessee Martin 16:1.

MUW vs. UT Martin Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, MUW or UT Martin? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

  • The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at The University of Tennessee Martin than MUW ($11,955 vs. $12,487).
  • Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at The University of Tennessee Martin are 12% lower than at Mississippi University for Women ($7,544 vs. $8,572).
  • The University of Tennessee Martin is 24.4% more expensive for in-state tuition than MUW (about $2,068 more per year; $10,560.00 vs. $8,492.00).
  • Out-of-state tuition is 95.5% higher at UT Martin than at Mississippi University for Women (about $8,108 more per year; $16,600.00 vs. $8,492.00).
  • A larger share of students receive grant aid at Mississippi University for Women than at The University of Tennessee Martin (99% vs. 98%).
  • The average total grant financial aid received by The University of Tennessee Martin students is 12.7% larger than aid received by Mississippi University for Women students ($10,861 vs. $9,635).

MUW vs. UT Martin Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, MUW or UT Martin? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between UT Martin and MUW.

  • The typical SAT score (median estimate) at The University of Tennessee Martin (1090) is 70 points higher than at MUW (1020).
  • Incoming UT Martin students have a 1 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (22 vs. 21 at MUW).
  • Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Mississippi University for Women 850/1180; The University of Tennessee Martin 970/1210.
  • Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Mississippi University for Women 18/24; The University of Tennessee Martin 19/25.
  • Submitting SAT or ACT scores: MUW - Test optional; UT Martin - Required.
  • Accepted freshman UT Martin students have a 0.11 point higher average high school GPA (3.6) than students at MUW (3.49).
  • MUW has a higher acceptance rate (90.3%) than UT Martin (88.2%).
  • The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 34.6% at MUW vs. 22.8% at UT Martin.

MUW vs. UT Martin Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for MUW and UT Martin? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

  • The University of Tennessee Martin's six-year graduation rate (48%) is higher than Mississippi University for Women's (39%).
  • Graduates from The University of Tennessee Martin earn a median of about $1,300 more per year than MUW graduates about ten years after starting college ($39,100 vs. $37,800), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
  • Among federal student loan borrowers, Mississippi University for Women graduates have a $8,500 lower median loan debt than UT Martin graduates ($15,000 vs. $23,500).
  • Among borrowers, MUW graduates have an estimated $87 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than UT Martin graduates ($155 vs. $242).
  • More MUW graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former UT Martin students, three years after graduation. (57% vs. 54%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.