FIT vs. UCO-Central

Comparable Facts

Compare Fashion Institute of Technology in New York, NY with University of Central Oklahoma in Edmond, OK on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

University of Central Oklahoma is larger than FIT based on total student enrollment (12,554 students vs. 8,206 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Fashion Institute of Technology is located in New York, NY (Large City setting); University of Central Oklahoma is in Edmond, OK (Large Suburban setting).
• Fashion Institute of Technology is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. University of Central Oklahoma is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Fashion Institute of Technology 16:1; University of Central Oklahoma 18:1.

FIT vs. UCO-Central Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, FIT or UCO-Central? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Fashion Institute of Technology than UCO-Central ($16,340 vs. $18,660).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at University of Central Oklahoma are 61.9% lower than at Fashion Institute of Technology ($9,700 vs. $25,458).
• University of Central Oklahoma is 40.1% more expensive for in-state tuition than FIT (about $2,524 more per year; $8,818.00 vs. $6,294.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 16.8% higher at UCO-Central than at Fashion Institute of Technology (about $2,830 more per year; $19,704.00 vs. $16,874.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at University of Central Oklahoma than at Fashion Institute of Technology (81% vs. 43%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Fashion Institute of Technology students is 16.1% larger than aid received by University of Central Oklahoma students ($8,304 vs. $7,152).

FIT vs. UCO-Central Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, FIT or UCO-Central? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between UCO-Central and FIT.

• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted studentsUniversity of Central Oklahoma 18/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: FIT - Test-free; UCO-Central - Required.
• Typical fall application deadline: FIT Jan 1, 2027.
• UCO-Central has a higher acceptance rate (78.1%) than FIT (60.2%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 55.8% at FIT vs. 42.9% at UCO-Central.

FIT vs. UCO-Central Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for FIT and UCO-Central? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Graduates from Fashion Institute of Technology earn a median of about $7,000 more per year than UCO-Central graduates about ten years after starting college ($51,600 vs. $44,600), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Fashion Institute of Technology graduates have a $893 lower median loan debt than UCO-Central graduates ($19,500 vs. $20,393).
• Among borrowers, FIT graduates have an estimated $9 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than UCO-Central graduates ($201 vs. $210).
• More FIT graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former UCO-Central students, three years after graduation. (70% vs. 54%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.