University of Minnesota-Crookston vs. A&M-Central Texas

Comparable Facts

Compare University of Minnesota Crookston in Crookston, MN with Texas A&M University Central Texas in Killeen, TX on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

University of Minnesota Crookston is larger than A&M-Central Texas based on total student enrollment (2,612 students vs. 2,403 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• University of Minnesota Crookston is located in Crookston, MN (Distant Town setting); Texas A&M University Central Texas is in Killeen, TX (Rural Fringe setting).
• University of Minnesota Crookston is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Texas A&M University Central Texas is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: University of Minnesota Crookston 18:1; Texas A&M University Central Texas 16:1.

University of Minnesota-Crookston vs. A&M-Central Texas Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, University of Minnesota-Crookston or A&M-Central Texas? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Texas A&M University Central Texas than University of Minnesota-Crookston ($1,794 vs. $13,490).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at University of Minnesota Crookston are 3.2% lower than at Texas A&M University Central Texas ($11,024 vs. $11,394).
• University of Minnesota Crookston is 80.5% more expensive for in-state tuition than A&M-Central Texas (about $5,925 more per year; $13,288.00 vs. $7,363.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 29.1% higher at A&M-Central Texas than at University of Minnesota Crookston (about $3,866 more per year; $17,154.00 vs. $13,288.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Texas A&M University Central Texas than at University of Minnesota Crookston (100% vs. 93%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by University of Minnesota Crookston students is 5.6% larger than aid received by Texas A&M University Central Texas students ($12,476 vs. $11,810).

University of Minnesota-Crookston vs. A&M-Central Texas Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, University of Minnesota-Crookston or A&M-Central Texas? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between A&M-Central Texas and University of Minnesota-Crookston.

• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: University of Minnesota-Crookston - Test-free; A&M-Central Texas - Test-free.
• Typical fall application deadline: University of Minnesota-Crookston Sep 12, 2026.
• A&M-Central Texas has a higher acceptance rate (100%) than University of Minnesota-Crookston (87.9%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 17.6% at University of Minnesota-Crookston vs. 66.1% at A&M-Central Texas.

University of Minnesota-Crookston vs. A&M-Central Texas Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for University of Minnesota-Crookston and A&M-Central Texas? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Among federal student loan borrowers, Texas A&M University Central Texas graduates have a $8,237 lower median loan debt than University of Minnesota-Crookston graduates ($12,263 vs. $20,500).
• Among borrowers, A&M-Central Texas graduates have an estimated $85 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than University of Minnesota-Crookston graduates ($126 vs. $211).

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.