UALR vs. MUW

Comparable Facts

Compare University of Arkansas at Little Rock in Little Rock, AR with Mississippi University for Women in Columbus, MS on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock is larger than MUW based on total student enrollment (8,216 students vs. 2,193 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• University of Arkansas at Little Rock is located in Little Rock, AR (Midsize City setting); Mississippi University for Women is in Columbus, MS (Remote Town setting).
• University of Arkansas at Little Rock is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Mississippi University for Women is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: University of Arkansas at Little Rock 13:1; Mississippi University for Women 10:1.

UALR vs. MUW Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, UALR or MUW? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at University of Arkansas at Little Rock than MUW ($12,033 vs. $12,487).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Mississippi University for Women are 20.3% lower than at University of Arkansas at Little Rock ($8,572 vs. $10,760).
• University of Arkansas at Little Rock is 14.8% more expensive for in-state tuition than MUW (about $1,256 more per year; $9,748.00 vs. $8,492.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 160.9% higher at UALR than at Mississippi University for Women (about $13,666 more per year; $22,158.00 vs. $8,492.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Mississippi University for Women than at University of Arkansas at Little Rock (99% vs. 92%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by University of Arkansas at Little Rock students is 14.3% larger than aid received by Mississippi University for Women students ($11,013 vs. $9,635).

UALR vs. MUW Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, UALR or MUW? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between MUW and UALR.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at University of Arkansas at Little Rock (1090) is 70 points higher than at MUW (1020).
• Incoming MUW students have a 1 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (21 vs. 20 at UALR).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: University of Arkansas at Little Rock 960/1210; Mississippi University for Women 850/1180.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: University of Arkansas at Little Rock 17/24; Mississippi University for Women 18/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: UALR - Required; MUW - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: UALR Aug 17, 2027.
• Accepted freshman MUW students have a 0.07 point higher average high school GPA (3.49) than students at UALR (3.42).
• MUW has a higher acceptance rate (90.3%) than UALR (58.8%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 21.8% at UALR vs. 34.6% at MUW.

UALR vs. MUW Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for UALR and MUW? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Mississippi University for Women's six-year graduation rate (39%) is higher than University of Arkansas at Little Rock's (21%).
• Graduates from University of Arkansas at Little Rock earn a median of about $200 more per year than MUW graduates about ten years after starting college ($38,000 vs. $37,800), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Mississippi University for Women graduates have a $5,500 lower median loan debt than UALR graduates ($15,000 vs. $20,500).
• Among borrowers, MUW graduates have an estimated $56 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than UALR graduates ($155 vs. $211).
• More MUW graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former UALR students, three years after graduation. (57% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.