Stonehill College vs. Neumann

Comparable Facts

Compare Stonehill College in Easton, MA with Neumann University in Aston, PA on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Stonehill College is larger than Neumann based on total student enrollment (2,674 students vs. 2,244 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Stonehill College is located in Easton, MA (Large Suburban setting); Neumann University is in Aston, PA (Large Suburban setting).
• Stonehill College is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. Neumann University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Stonehill College 12:1; Neumann University 13:1.

Stonehill College vs. Neumann Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Stonehill College or Neumann? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Neumann University than Stonehill College ($28,469 vs. $33,385).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Neumann University are 1.7% lower than at Stonehill College ($15,840 vs. $16,120).
• Stonehill College is 47% more expensive for in-state tuition than Neumann (about $18,390 more per year; $57,490.00 vs. $39,100.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 47% higher at Stonehill College than at Neumann University (about $18,390 more per year; $57,490.00 vs. $39,100.00).
• The same share of students receive grant aid at Stonehill College as at Neumann University (100% vs. 100%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Stonehill College students is 37% larger than aid received by Neumann University students ($39,344 vs. $28,711).

Stonehill College vs. Neumann Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Stonehill College or Neumann? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Neumann and Stonehill College.

• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted studentsNeumann University 905/1085.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted studentsNeumann University 17/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Stonehill College - Test-free; Neumann - Test-free.
• Typical fall application deadline: Stonehill College Jan 15, 2027; Neumann Aug 15, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Stonehill College students have a 0.09 point higher average high school GPA (3.32) than students at Neumann (3.23).
• Neumann has a higher acceptance rate (81.3%) than Stonehill College (66.3%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 14% at Stonehill College vs. 10.2% at Neumann.

Stonehill College vs. Neumann Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Stonehill College and Neumann? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Stonehill College's six-year graduation rate (81%) is higher than Neumann University's (55%).
• Graduates from Stonehill College earn a median of about $21,400 more per year than Neumann graduates about ten years after starting college ($66,000 vs. $44,600), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Neumann University and Stonehill College graduates have the same median loan debt ($27,000 vs. $27,000).
• Among borrowers in the federal data, Neumann University and Stonehill College graduates have the same median monthly federal student loan payment ($279 vs. $279).
• More Stonehill College graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Neumann students, three years after graduation. (87% vs. 57%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.