Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology vs. A&M-Central Texas

Comparable Facts

Compare Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology in Okmulgee, OK with Texas A&M University Central Texas in Killeen, TX on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Texas A&M University Central Texas is larger than Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology based on total student enrollment (2,403 students vs. 2,396 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology is located in Okmulgee, OK (Distant Town setting); Texas A&M University Central Texas is in Killeen, TX (Rural Fringe setting).
• Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Texas A&M University Central Texas is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology 16:1; Texas A&M University Central Texas 16:1.

Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology vs. A&M-Central Texas Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology or A&M-Central Texas? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Texas A&M University Central Texas than Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology ($1,794 vs. $10,869).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology are 38.1% lower than at Texas A&M University Central Texas ($7,056 vs. $11,394).
• Texas A&M University Central Texas is 27.5% more expensive for in-state tuition than Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology (about $1,589 more per year; $7,363.00 vs. $5,774.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 50.7% higher at A&M-Central Texas than at Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology (about $5,770 more per year; $17,154.00 vs. $11,384.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Texas A&M University Central Texas than at Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology (100% vs. 98%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Texas A&M University Central Texas students is 78.2% larger than aid received by Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology students ($11,810 vs. $6,626).

Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology vs. A&M-Central Texas Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology or A&M-Central Texas? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between A&M-Central Texas and Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology.

• Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology reports an open admissions policy.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology - Open admission; A&M-Central Texas - Test-free.

Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology vs. A&M-Central Texas Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology and A&M-Central Texas? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Among federal student loan borrowers, Texas A&M University Central Texas graduates have a $250 lower median loan debt than Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology graduates ($12,263 vs. $12,513).
• Among borrowers, A&M-Central Texas graduates have an estimated $3 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Oklahoma State University Institute of Technology graduates ($126 vs. $129).

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.