Missouri University of Science and Technology vs. Lipscomb

Comparable Facts

Compare Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, MO with Lipscomb University in Nashville, TN on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Missouri University of Science and Technology is larger than Lipscomb based on total student enrollment (7,154 students vs. 5,017 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Missouri University of Science and Technology is located in Rolla, MO (Remote Town setting); Lipscomb University is in Nashville, TN (Large City setting).
• Missouri University of Science and Technology is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Lipscomb University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Missouri University of Science and Technology 17:1; Lipscomb University 13:1.

Missouri University of Science and Technology vs. Lipscomb Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Missouri University of Science and Technology or Lipscomb? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Missouri University of Science and Technology than Lipscomb ($17,366 vs. $27,695).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Missouri University of Science and Technology are 16.6% lower than at Lipscomb University ($12,862 vs. $15,424).
• Lipscomb University is 170.8% more expensive for in-state tuition than Missouri University of Science and Technology (about $25,588 more per year; $40,572.00 vs. $14,984.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 22% higher at Lipscomb than at Missouri University of Science and Technology (about $7,324 more per year; $40,572.00 vs. $33,248.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Lipscomb University than at Missouri University of Science and Technology (100% vs. 98%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Lipscomb University students is 100.5% larger than aid received by Missouri University of Science and Technology students ($28,645 vs. $14,289).

Missouri University of Science and Technology vs. Lipscomb Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Missouri University of Science and Technology or Lipscomb? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Lipscomb and Missouri University of Science and Technology.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Missouri University of Science and Technology (1310) is 40 points higher than at Lipscomb (1270).
• Incoming Missouri University of Science and Technology students have a 2 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (28 vs. 26 at Lipscomb).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Missouri University of Science and Technology 1190/1420; Lipscomb University 1160/1380.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Missouri University of Science and Technology 25/31; Lipscomb University 23/30.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Missouri University of Science and Technology - Test optional; Lipscomb - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Missouri University of Science and Technology Jul 1, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Missouri University of Science and Technology students have a 0.08 point higher average high school GPA (3.81) than students at Lipscomb (3.73).
• Missouri University of Science and Technology has a higher acceptance rate (72.5%) than Lipscomb (67.7%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 20.9% at Missouri University of Science and Technology vs. 24.9% at Lipscomb.

Missouri University of Science and Technology vs. Lipscomb Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Missouri University of Science and Technology and Lipscomb? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Missouri University of Science and Technology's six-year graduation rate (67%) is higher than Lipscomb University's (63%).
• Graduates from Missouri University of Science and Technology earn a median of about $21,500 more per year than Lipscomb graduates about ten years after starting college ($68,400 vs. $46,900), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Lipscomb University graduates have a $4,063 lower median loan debt than Missouri University of Science and Technology graduates ($20,500 vs. $24,563).
• Among borrowers, Lipscomb graduates have an estimated $42 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Missouri University of Science and Technology graduates ($211 vs. $253).
• More Missouri University of Science and Technology graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Lipscomb students, three years after graduation. (83% vs. 68%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.