Minnesota State University-Mankato vs. FIT

Comparable Facts

Compare Minnesota State University Mankato in Mankato, MN with Fashion Institute of Technology in New York, NY on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Minnesota State University Mankato is larger than FIT based on total student enrollment (15,271 students vs. 8,206 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Minnesota State University Mankato is located in Mankato, MN (Remote Town setting); Fashion Institute of Technology is in New York, NY (Large City setting).
• Minnesota State University Mankato is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Fashion Institute of Technology is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Minnesota State University Mankato 21:1; Fashion Institute of Technology 16:1.

Minnesota State University-Mankato vs. FIT Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Minnesota State University-Mankato or FIT? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Fashion Institute of Technology than Minnesota State University-Mankato ($16,340 vs. $18,861).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Minnesota State University Mankato are 51.2% lower than at Fashion Institute of Technology ($12,420 vs. $25,458).
• Minnesota State University Mankato is 52.1% more expensive for in-state tuition than FIT (about $3,278 more per year; $9,572.00 vs. $6,294.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 12.3% higher at Minnesota State University-Mankato than at Fashion Institute of Technology (about $2,068 more per year; $18,942.00 vs. $16,874.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Minnesota State University Mankato than at Fashion Institute of Technology (78% vs. 43%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Fashion Institute of Technology students is 55.9% larger than aid received by Minnesota State University Mankato students ($8,304 vs. $5,325).

Minnesota State University-Mankato vs. FIT Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Minnesota State University-Mankato or FIT? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between FIT and Minnesota State University-Mankato.

• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Minnesota State University Mankato 19/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Minnesota State University-Mankato - Test optional; FIT - Test-free.
• Typical fall application deadline: FIT Jan 1, 2027.
• Minnesota State University-Mankato has a higher acceptance rate (88.4%) than FIT (60.2%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 29.4% at Minnesota State University-Mankato vs. 55.8% at FIT.

Minnesota State University-Mankato vs. FIT Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Minnesota State University-Mankato and FIT? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Graduates from Fashion Institute of Technology earn a median of about $5,300 more per year than Minnesota State University-Mankato graduates about ten years after starting college ($51,600 vs. $46,300), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Fashion Institute of Technology graduates have a $3,075 lower median loan debt than Minnesota State University-Mankato graduates ($19,500 vs. $22,575).
• Among borrowers, FIT graduates have an estimated $32 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Minnesota State University-Mankato graduates ($201 vs. $233).
• More Minnesota State University-Mankato graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former FIT students, three years after graduation. (72% vs. 70%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.