LEC vs. University of Rio Grande

Comparable Facts

Compare Lake Erie College in Painesville, OH with University of Rio Grande in Rio Grande, OH on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

University of Rio Grande is larger than LEC based on total student enrollment (2,258 students vs. 1,108 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Lake Erie College is located in Painesville, OH (Large Suburban setting); University of Rio Grande is in Rio Grande, OH (Distant Rural setting).
• Lake Erie College is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. University of Rio Grande is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Lake Erie College 12:1; University of Rio Grande 20:1.

LEC vs. University of Rio Grande Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, LEC or University of Rio Grande? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Lake Erie College than University of Rio Grande ($22,892 vs. $24,061).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at University of Rio Grande are 19.5% lower than at Lake Erie College ($10,500 vs. $13,036).
• Lake Erie College is 83% more expensive for in-state tuition than University of Rio Grande (about $17,074 more per year; $37,634.00 vs. $20,560.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 83% higher at LEC than at University of Rio Grande (about $17,074 more per year; $37,634.00 vs. $20,560.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Lake Erie College than at University of Rio Grande (100% vs. 95%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Lake Erie College students is 212.9% larger than aid received by University of Rio Grande students ($27,879 vs. $8,910).

LEC vs. University of Rio Grande Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, LEC or University of Rio Grande? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between University of Rio Grande and LEC.

• University of Rio Grande reports an open admissions policy.
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Lake Erie College 945/1115.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Lake Erie College 18/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: LEC - Test-free; University of Rio Grande - Open admission.
• Typical fall application deadline: LEC Aug 1, 2027.
• Accepted freshman LEC students have a 0.13 point higher average high school GPA (3.19) than students at University of Rio Grande (3.06).

LEC vs. University of Rio Grande Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for LEC and University of Rio Grande? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Lake Erie College's six-year graduation rate (53%) is higher than University of Rio Grande's (27%).
• Graduates from Lake Erie College earn a median of about $2,700 more per year than University of Rio Grande graduates about ten years after starting college ($36,600 vs. $33,900), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, University of Rio Grande graduates have a $6,500 lower median loan debt than LEC graduates ($20,500 vs. $27,000).
• Among borrowers, University of Rio Grande graduates have an estimated $68 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than LEC graduates ($211 vs. $279).
• More LEC graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former University of Rio Grande students, three years after graduation. (62% vs. 35%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.