Indiana Tech vs. WWU

Comparable Facts

Compare Indiana Institute of Technology in Fort Wayne, IN with William Woods University in Fulton, MO on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Indiana Institute of Technology is larger than WWU based on total student enrollment (2,770 students vs. 2,046 students).

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Indiana Institute of Technology is located in Fort Wayne, IN (Large City setting); William Woods University is in Fulton, MO (Distant Town setting).
• Indiana Institute of Technology is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. William Woods University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Indiana Institute of Technology 16:1; William Woods University 16:1.

Indiana Tech vs. WWU Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Indiana Tech or WWU? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Indiana Institute of Technology than WWU ($24,208 vs. $27,092).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at William Woods University are 4.7% lower than at Indiana Institute of Technology ($13,050 vs. $13,694).
• Indiana Institute of Technology is 3.4% more expensive for in-state tuition than WWU (about $1,021 more per year; $31,361.00 vs. $30,340.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 3.4% higher at Indiana Tech than at William Woods University (about $1,021 more per year; $31,361.00 vs. $30,340.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Indiana Institute of Technology than at William Woods University (100% vs. 99%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by William Woods University students is 2.4% larger than aid received by Indiana Institute of Technology students ($22,204 vs. $21,677).

Indiana Tech vs. WWU Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Indiana Tech or WWU? Typical SAT and ACT scores (midpoint estimates from the mid-50% ranges in the table above), enrolled-tester score ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between WWU and Indiana Tech.

• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Indiana Tech - Test-free; WWU - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Indiana Tech Aug 15, 2027; WWU Dec 1, 2026.
• Enrolled freshman WWU students have a 0.37 point higher average high school GPA (3.4) than students at Indiana Tech (3.03).
• WWU has a higher acceptance rate (71%) than Indiana Tech (70.4%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 13.3% at Indiana Tech vs. 23.6% at WWU.

Indiana Tech vs. WWU Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Indiana Tech and WWU? Where federal data is available for both schools, the bullets below compare graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt using the same College Scorecard / IPEDS fields as the comparison table. If a metric is missing for one school, that school is noted separately.

• William Woods University's six-year graduation rate (50%) is higher than Indiana Institute of Technology's (18%).
• Graduates from Indiana Institute of Technology earn a median of about $8,000 more per year than WWU graduates about ten years after starting college ($46,600 vs. $38,600), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, William Woods University graduates have a $5,425 lower median loan debt than Indiana Tech graduates ($21,437 vs. $26,862).
• Among borrowers, WWU graduates have an estimated $56 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Indiana Tech graduates ($221 vs. $277).
• More WWU graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Indiana Tech students, three years after graduation. (68% vs. 37%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.