Indiana Tech vs. Paul Quinn College

Comparable Facts

Compare Indiana Institute of Technology in Fort Wayne, IN with Paul Quinn College in Dallas, TX on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Indiana Institute of Technology is larger than Paul Quinn College based on total student enrollment (2,770 students vs. 628 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Indiana Institute of Technology is located in Fort Wayne, IN (Large City setting); Paul Quinn College is in Dallas, TX (Large City setting).
• Indiana Institute of Technology is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. Paul Quinn College is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Indiana Institute of Technology 16:1; Paul Quinn College 20:1.

Indiana Tech vs. Paul Quinn College Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Indiana Tech or Paul Quinn College? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Paul Quinn College than Indiana Tech ($12,709 vs. $24,208).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Paul Quinn College are 44.1% lower than at Indiana Institute of Technology ($7,650 vs. $13,694).
• Indiana Institute of Technology is 132.3% more expensive for in-state tuition than Paul Quinn College (about $17,863 more per year; $31,361.00 vs. $13,498.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 132.3% higher at Indiana Tech than at Paul Quinn College (about $17,863 more per year; $31,361.00 vs. $13,498.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Indiana Institute of Technology than at Paul Quinn College (100% vs. 99%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Indiana Institute of Technology students is 99.3% larger than aid received by Paul Quinn College students ($21,677 vs. $10,878).

Indiana Tech vs. Paul Quinn College Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Indiana Tech or Paul Quinn College? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Paul Quinn College and Indiana Tech.

• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted studentsPaul Quinn College 855/1015.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted studentsPaul Quinn College 14/17.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Indiana Tech - Test-free; Paul Quinn College - Test-free.
• Typical fall application deadline: Indiana Tech Aug 15, 2027; Paul Quinn College Jun 1, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Indiana Tech students have a 0.43 point higher average high school GPA (3.03) than students at Paul Quinn College (2.6).
• Indiana Tech has a higher acceptance rate (70.4%) than Paul Quinn College (40.3%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 13.3% at Indiana Tech vs. 13.6% at Paul Quinn College.

Indiana Tech vs. Paul Quinn College Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Indiana Tech and Paul Quinn College? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Indiana Institute of Technology's six-year graduation rate (18%) is higher than Paul Quinn College's (5%).
• Graduates from Indiana Institute of Technology earn a median of about $17,300 more per year than Paul Quinn College graduates about ten years after starting college ($46,600 vs. $29,300), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• More Indiana Tech graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Paul Quinn College students, three years after graduation. (37% vs. 17%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.