HTC vs. Minnesota State University-Mankato

Comparable Facts

Compare Hebrew Theological College in Skokie, IL with Minnesota State University Mankato in Mankato, MN on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Minnesota State University Mankato is larger than HTC based on total student enrollment (15,271 students vs. 182 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Hebrew Theological College is located in Skokie, IL (Small City setting); Minnesota State University Mankato is in Mankato, MN (Remote Town setting).
• Hebrew Theological College is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. Minnesota State University Mankato is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Hebrew Theological College 5:1; Minnesota State University Mankato 21:1.

HTC vs. Minnesota State University-Mankato Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, HTC or Minnesota State University-Mankato? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Hebrew Theological College than Minnesota State University-Mankato ($16,158 vs. $18,861).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Minnesota State University Mankato are 17.2% lower than at Hebrew Theological College ($12,420 vs. $15,000).
• Hebrew Theological College is 58.3% more expensive for in-state tuition than Minnesota State University-Mankato (about $5,578 more per year; $15,150.00 vs. $9,572.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 25% higher at Minnesota State University-Mankato than at Hebrew Theological College (about $3,792 more per year; $18,942.00 vs. $15,150.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Minnesota State University Mankato than at Hebrew Theological College (78% vs. 67%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Hebrew Theological College students is 173.7% larger than aid received by Minnesota State University Mankato students ($14,576 vs. $5,325).

HTC vs. Minnesota State University-Mankato Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, HTC or Minnesota State University-Mankato? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Minnesota State University-Mankato and HTC.

• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted studentsMinnesota State University Mankato 19/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: HTC - Test optional; Minnesota State University-Mankato - Test optional.
• Accepted freshman Minnesota State University-Mankato students have a 0.13 point higher average high school GPA (3.37) than students at HTC (3.24).
• Minnesota State University-Mankato has a higher acceptance rate (88.4%) than HTC (57.1%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 87.5% at HTC vs. 29.4% at Minnesota State University-Mankato.

HTC vs. Minnesota State University-Mankato Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for HTC and Minnesota State University-Mankato? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Minnesota State University Mankato's six-year graduation rate (50%) is higher than Hebrew Theological College's (6%).
• Graduates from Minnesota State University Mankato earn a median of about $17,800 more per year than HTC graduates about ten years after starting college ($46,300 vs. $28,500), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• More HTC graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Minnesota State University-Mankato students, three years after graduation. (78% vs. 72%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.