Earlham vs. WLC

Comparable Facts

Compare Earlham College in Richmond, IN with Wisconsin Lutheran College in Milwaukee, WI on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Wisconsin Lutheran College is larger than Earlham based on total student enrollment (1,027 students vs. 753 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Earlham College is located in Richmond, IN (Distant Town setting); Wisconsin Lutheran College is in Milwaukee, WI (Large City setting).
• Earlham College is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. Wisconsin Lutheran College is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Earlham College 7:1; Wisconsin Lutheran College 11:1.

Earlham vs. WLC Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Earlham or WLC? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Wisconsin Lutheran College than Earlham ($24,095 vs. $27,107).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Wisconsin Lutheran College are 12.4% lower than at Earlham College ($12,250 vs. $13,985).
• Earlham College is 49.3% more expensive for in-state tuition than WLC (about $17,820 more per year; $53,930.00 vs. $36,110.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 49.3% higher at Earlham than at Wisconsin Lutheran College (about $17,820 more per year; $53,930.00 vs. $36,110.00).
• The same share of students receive grant aid at Earlham College as at Wisconsin Lutheran College (100% vs. 100%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Earlham College students is 65% larger than aid received by Wisconsin Lutheran College students ($40,618 vs. $24,624).

Earlham vs. WLC Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Earlham or WLC? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between WLC and Earlham.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Earlham College (1200) is 100 points higher than at WLC (1100).
• Incoming Earlham students have a 2 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (28 vs. 26 at WLC).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Earlham College 1110/1290; Wisconsin Lutheran College 970/1230.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Earlham College 24/33; Wisconsin Lutheran College 23/29.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Earlham - Test optional; WLC - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Earlham Mar 1, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Earlham students have a 0.13 point higher average high school GPA (3.67) than students at WLC (3.54).
• WLC has a higher acceptance rate (78.2%) than Earlham (73.1%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 13.9% at Earlham vs. 20.2% at WLC.

Earlham vs. WLC Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Earlham and WLC? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Earlham College's six-year graduation rate (66%) is higher than Wisconsin Lutheran College's (63%).
• Graduates from Wisconsin Lutheran College earn a median of about $3,900 more per year than Earlham graduates about ten years after starting college ($43,000 vs. $39,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Wisconsin Lutheran College graduates have a $1,000 lower median loan debt than Earlham graduates ($25,000 vs. $26,000).
• Among borrowers, WLC graduates have an estimated $10 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Earlham graduates ($258 vs. $268).
• More WLC graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Earlham students, three years after graduation. (77% vs. 75%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.