Earlham vs. MICA

Comparable Facts

Compare Earlham College in Richmond, IN with Maryland Institute College of Art in Baltimore, MD on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Maryland Institute College of Art is larger than Earlham based on total student enrollment (1,687 students vs. 753 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Earlham College is located in Richmond, IN (Distant Town setting); Maryland Institute College of Art is in Baltimore, MD (Large City setting).
• Earlham College is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. Maryland Institute College of Art is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Earlham College 7:1; Maryland Institute College of Art 9:1.

Earlham vs. MICA Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Earlham or MICA? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Earlham College than MICA ($27,107 vs. $47,834).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Earlham College are 31.4% lower than at Maryland Institute College of Art ($13,985 vs. $20,400).
• Maryland Institute College of Art is 5.3% more expensive for in-state tuition than Earlham (about $2,870 more per year; $56,800.00 vs. $53,930.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 5.3% higher at MICA than at Earlham College (about $2,870 more per year; $56,800.00 vs. $53,930.00).
• The same share of students receive grant aid at Earlham College as at Maryland Institute College of Art (100% vs. 100%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Earlham College students is 37.3% larger than aid received by Maryland Institute College of Art students ($40,618 vs. $29,578).

Earlham vs. MICA Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Earlham or MICA? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between MICA and Earlham.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Earlham College (1200) is 10 points higher than at MICA (1190).
• Incoming MICA students have a 1 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (29 vs. 28 at Earlham).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Earlham College 1110/1290; Maryland Institute College of Art 1078/1305.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Earlham College 24/33; Maryland Institute College of Art 25/33.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Earlham - Test optional; MICA - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Earlham Mar 1, 2027; MICA Feb 1, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Earlham students have a 0.2 point higher average high school GPA (3.67) than students at MICA (3.47).
• MICA has a higher acceptance rate (76.8%) than Earlham (73.1%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 13.9% at Earlham vs. 10.4% at MICA.

Earlham vs. MICA Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Earlham and MICA? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Maryland Institute College of Art's six-year graduation rate (71%) is higher than Earlham College's (66%).
• Graduates from Maryland Institute College of Art earn a median of about $1,200 more per year than Earlham graduates about ten years after starting college ($40,300 vs. $39,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Earlham College graduates have a $1,000 lower median loan debt than MICA graduates ($26,000 vs. $27,000).
• Among borrowers, Earlham graduates have an estimated $11 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than MICA graduates ($268 vs. $279).
• More Earlham graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former MICA students, three years after graduation. (75% vs. 72%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.