Hunter vs. Carnegie Mellon

Comparable Facts

Compare CUNY Hunter College in New York, NY with Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, PA on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

CUNY Hunter College is larger than Carnegie Mellon based on total student enrollment (22,538 students vs. 15,888 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• CUNY Hunter College is located in New York, NY (Large City setting); Carnegie Mellon University is in Pittsburgh, PA (Large City setting).
• CUNY Hunter College is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Carnegie Mellon University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: CUNY Hunter College 14:1; Carnegie Mellon University 5:1.

Hunter vs. Carnegie Mellon Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Hunter or Carnegie Mellon? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at CUNY Hunter College than Carnegie Mellon ($4,431 vs. $35,552).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at CUNY Hunter College are 34.9% lower than at Carnegie Mellon University ($11,832 vs. $18,166).
• Carnegie Mellon University is 797.4% more expensive for in-state tuition than Hunter (about $58,864 more per year; $66,246.00 vs. $7,382.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 332.1% higher at Carnegie Mellon than at CUNY Hunter College (about $50,914 more per year; $66,246.00 vs. $15,332.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at CUNY Hunter College than at Carnegie Mellon University (87% vs. 51%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Carnegie Mellon University students is 393.2% larger than aid received by CUNY Hunter College students ($48,107 vs. $9,755).

Hunter vs. Carnegie Mellon Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Hunter or Carnegie Mellon? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Carnegie Mellon and Hunter.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Carnegie Mellon University (1540) is 280 points higher than at Hunter (1260).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: CUNY Hunter College 1100/1420; Carnegie Mellon University 1500/1570.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted studentsCarnegie Mellon University 34/35.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Hunter - Test optional; Carnegie Mellon - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Carnegie Mellon Jan 1, 2027.
• Accepted freshman Carnegie Mellon students have a 0.19 point higher average high school GPA (3.89) than students at Hunter (3.7).
• Hunter has a higher acceptance rate (53.8%) than Carnegie Mellon (11.7%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 16.7% at Hunter vs. 45.7% at Carnegie Mellon.

Hunter vs. Carnegie Mellon Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Hunter and Carnegie Mellon? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Carnegie Mellon University's six-year graduation rate (87%) is higher than CUNY Hunter College's (46%).
• Graduates from Carnegie Mellon University earn a median of about $53,900 more per year than Hunter graduates about ten years after starting college ($102,700 vs. $48,800), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, CUNY Hunter College graduates have a $14,702 lower median loan debt than Carnegie Mellon graduates ($11,548 vs. $26,250).
• Among borrowers, Hunter graduates have an estimated $152 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Carnegie Mellon graduates ($119 vs. $271).
• More Carnegie Mellon graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Hunter students, three years after graduation. (91% vs. 56%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.