ATU vs. A&M-Texarkana

Comparable Facts

Compare Arkansas Tech University in Russellville, AR with Texas A&M University Texarkana in Texarkana, TX on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Arkansas Tech University is larger than A&M-Texarkana based on total student enrollment (8,746 students vs. 2,412 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Arkansas Tech University is located in Russellville, AR (Remote Town setting); Texas A&M University Texarkana is in Texarkana, TX (Small City setting).
• Arkansas Tech University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Texas A&M University Texarkana is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Arkansas Tech University 17:1; Texas A&M University Texarkana 14:1.

ATU vs. A&M-Texarkana Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, ATU or A&M-Texarkana? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Arkansas Tech University than A&M-Texarkana ($12,626 vs. $12,747).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Arkansas Tech University are 26% lower than at Texas A&M University Texarkana ($10,338 vs. $13,972).
• Arkansas Tech University is 3.9% more expensive for in-state tuition than A&M-Texarkana (about $325 more per year; $8,674.00 vs. $8,349.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 207.3% higher at A&M-Texarkana than at Arkansas Tech University (about $30,412 more per year; $45,080.00 vs. $14,668.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Arkansas Tech University than at Texas A&M University Texarkana (93% vs. 92%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Texas A&M University Texarkana students is 8.4% larger than aid received by Arkansas Tech University students ($10,736 vs. $9,901).

ATU vs. A&M-Texarkana Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, ATU or A&M-Texarkana? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between A&M-Texarkana and ATU.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Arkansas Tech University (990) is 10 points higher than at A&M-Texarkana (980).
• Incoming ATU students have a 1 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (20 vs. 19 at A&M-Texarkana).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 880/1100; Texas A&M University Texarkana 870/1080.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 17/23; Texas A&M University Texarkana 16/22.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: ATU - Required; A&M-Texarkana - Test-free.
• Accepted freshman A&M-Texarkana students have a 0.02 point higher average high school GPA (3.39) than students at ATU (3.37).
• ATU has a higher acceptance rate (95.9%) than A&M-Texarkana (63.5%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.6% at ATU vs. 16.9% at A&M-Texarkana.

ATU vs. A&M-Texarkana Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for ATU and A&M-Texarkana? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Graduates from Texas A&M University Texarkana earn a median of about $800 more per year than ATU graduates about ten years after starting college ($37,900 vs. $37,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Texas A&M University Texarkana graduates have a $3,246 lower median loan debt than ATU graduates ($14,504 vs. $17,750).
• Among borrowers, A&M-Texarkana graduates have an estimated $34 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than ATU graduates ($149 vs. $183).
• More A&M-Texarkana graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former ATU students, three years after graduation. (53% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.