ATU vs. MUW

Comparable Facts

Compare Arkansas Tech University in Russellville, AR with Mississippi University for Women in Columbus, MS on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Arkansas Tech University is larger than MUW based on total student enrollment (8,746 students vs. 2,193 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Arkansas Tech University is located in Russellville, AR (Remote Town setting); Mississippi University for Women is in Columbus, MS (Remote Town setting).
• Arkansas Tech University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Mississippi University for Women is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Arkansas Tech University 17:1; Mississippi University for Women 10:1.

ATU vs. MUW Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, ATU or MUW? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Mississippi University for Women than ATU ($12,487 vs. $12,626).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Mississippi University for Women are 17.1% lower than at Arkansas Tech University ($8,572 vs. $10,338).
• Arkansas Tech University is 2.1% more expensive for in-state tuition than MUW (about $182 more per year; $8,674.00 vs. $8,492.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 72.7% higher at ATU than at Mississippi University for Women (about $6,176 more per year; $14,668.00 vs. $8,492.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Mississippi University for Women than at Arkansas Tech University (99% vs. 93%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Arkansas Tech University students is 2.8% larger than aid received by Mississippi University for Women students ($9,901 vs. $9,635).

ATU vs. MUW Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, ATU or MUW? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between MUW and ATU.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Mississippi University for Women (1020) is 30 points higher than at ATU (990).
• Incoming MUW students have a 1 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (21 vs. 20 at ATU).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 880/1100; Mississippi University for Women 850/1180.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 17/23; Mississippi University for Women 18/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: ATU - Required; MUW - Test optional.
• Accepted freshman MUW students have a 0.12 point higher average high school GPA (3.49) than students at ATU (3.37).
• ATU has a higher acceptance rate (95.9%) than MUW (90.3%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.6% at ATU vs. 34.6% at MUW.

ATU vs. MUW Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for ATU and MUW? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Arkansas Tech University's six-year graduation rate (43%) is higher than Mississippi University for Women's (39%).
• Graduates from Mississippi University for Women earn a median of about $700 more per year than ATU graduates about ten years after starting college ($37,800 vs. $37,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Mississippi University for Women graduates have a $2,750 lower median loan debt than ATU graduates ($15,000 vs. $17,750).
• Among borrowers, MUW graduates have an estimated $28 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than ATU graduates ($155 vs. $183).
• More MUW graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former ATU students, three years after graduation. (57% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.