ATU vs. Kansas City Art Institute

Comparable Facts

Compare Arkansas Tech University in Russellville, AR with Kansas City Art Institute in Kansas City, MO on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Arkansas Tech University is larger than Kansas City Art Institute based on total student enrollment (8,746 students vs. 813 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Arkansas Tech University is located in Russellville, AR (Remote Town setting); Kansas City Art Institute is in Kansas City, MO (Large City setting).
• Arkansas Tech University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Kansas City Art Institute is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Arkansas Tech University 17:1; Kansas City Art Institute 10:1.

ATU vs. Kansas City Art Institute Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, ATU or Kansas City Art Institute? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Arkansas Tech University than Kansas City Art Institute ($12,626 vs. $27,650).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Arkansas Tech University are 24.3% lower than at Kansas City Art Institute ($10,338 vs. $13,651).
• Kansas City Art Institute is 413.6% more expensive for in-state tuition than ATU (about $35,876 more per year; $44,550.00 vs. $8,674.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 203.7% higher at Kansas City Art Institute than at Arkansas Tech University (about $29,882 more per year; $44,550.00 vs. $14,668.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Kansas City Art Institute than at Arkansas Tech University (100% vs. 93%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Kansas City Art Institute students is 200.6% larger than aid received by Arkansas Tech University students ($29,760 vs. $9,901).

ATU vs. Kansas City Art Institute Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, ATU or Kansas City Art Institute? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Kansas City Art Institute and ATU.

• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 880/1100.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 17/23.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: ATU - Required; Kansas City Art Institute - Test-free.
• Accepted freshman ATU students have a 0.05 point higher average high school GPA (3.37) than students at Kansas City Art Institute (3.32).
• ATU has a higher acceptance rate (95.9%) than Kansas City Art Institute (54.8%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.6% at ATU vs. 35.1% at Kansas City Art Institute.

ATU vs. Kansas City Art Institute Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for ATU and Kansas City Art Institute? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Kansas City Art Institute's six-year graduation rate (77%) is higher than Arkansas Tech University's (43%).
• Graduates from Arkansas Tech University earn a median of about $4,200 more per year than Kansas City Art Institute graduates about ten years after starting college ($37,100 vs. $32,900), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Arkansas Tech University graduates have a $9,250 lower median loan debt than Kansas City Art Institute graduates ($17,750 vs. $27,000).
• Among borrowers, ATU graduates have an estimated $96 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Kansas City Art Institute graduates ($183 vs. $279).
• More Kansas City Art Institute graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former ATU students, three years after graduation. (62% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.