ATU vs. Calvary University

Comparable Facts

Compare Arkansas Tech University in Russellville, AR with Calvary University in Kansas City, MO on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Arkansas Tech University is larger than Calvary University based on total student enrollment (8,746 students vs. 244 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Arkansas Tech University is located in Russellville, AR (Remote Town setting); Calvary University is in Kansas City, MO (Large City setting).
• Arkansas Tech University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Calvary University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Arkansas Tech University 17:1; Calvary University 7:1.

ATU vs. Calvary University Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, ATU or Calvary University? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Arkansas Tech University than Calvary University ($12,626 vs. $17,066).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Calvary University are 37.2% lower than at Arkansas Tech University ($6,492 vs. $10,338).
• Calvary University is 62.5% more expensive for in-state tuition than ATU (about $5,420 more per year; $14,094.00 vs. $8,674.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 4.1% higher at ATU than at Calvary University (about $574 more per year; $14,668.00 vs. $14,094.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Arkansas Tech University than at Calvary University (93% vs. 88%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Arkansas Tech University students is 104.7% larger than aid received by Calvary University students ($9,901 vs. $4,836).

ATU vs. Calvary University Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, ATU or Calvary University? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Calvary University and ATU.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Calvary University (1060) is 70 points higher than at ATU (990).
• Incoming ATU students have the same typical ACT composite (median estimate; 20) as students at Calvary University (20).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 880/1100; Calvary University 980/1140.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 17/23; Calvary University 17/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: ATU - Required; Calvary University - Required.
• Accepted freshman ATU students have the same average high school GPA (3.37) as students at Calvary University (3.37).
• ATU has a higher acceptance rate (95.9%) than Calvary University (71.7%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.6% at ATU vs. 81.8% at Calvary University.

ATU vs. Calvary University Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for ATU and Calvary University? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• The graduation rate at ATU is the same as at Calvary University (43% vs. 43%).
• Graduates from Arkansas Tech University earn a median of about $1,000 more per year than Calvary University graduates about ten years after starting college ($37,100 vs. $36,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Arkansas Tech University graduates have a $3,196 lower median loan debt than Calvary University graduates ($17,750 vs. $20,946).
• Among borrowers, ATU graduates have an estimated $33 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Calvary University graduates ($183 vs. $216).
• More Calvary University graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former ATU students, three years after graduation. (56% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.