ATU vs. Avila University

Comparable Facts

Compare Arkansas Tech University in Russellville, AR with Avila University in Kansas City, MO on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Arkansas Tech University is larger than Avila University based on total student enrollment (8,746 students vs. 2,768 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Arkansas Tech University is located in Russellville, AR (Remote Town setting); Avila University is in Kansas City, MO (Large City setting).
• Arkansas Tech University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Avila University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Arkansas Tech University 17:1; Avila University 19:1.

ATU vs. Avila University Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, ATU or Avila University? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Arkansas Tech University than Avila University ($12,626 vs. $17,004).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Avila University are 9.7% lower than at Arkansas Tech University ($9,337 vs. $10,338).
• Avila University is 384.2% more expensive for in-state tuition than ATU (about $33,326 more per year; $42,000.00 vs. $8,674.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 186.3% higher at Avila University than at Arkansas Tech University (about $27,332 more per year; $42,000.00 vs. $14,668.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Avila University than at Arkansas Tech University (100% vs. 93%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Avila University students is 232.1% larger than aid received by Arkansas Tech University students ($32,883 vs. $9,901).

ATU vs. Avila University Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, ATU or Avila University? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Avila University and ATU.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at Arkansas Tech University (990) is 110 points higher than at Avila University (880).
• Incoming ATU students have a 2 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (20 vs. 18 at Avila University).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 880/1100; Avila University 800/960.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 17/23; Avila University 16/21.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: ATU - Required; Avila University - Test optional.
• Accepted freshman ATU students have a 0.13 point higher average high school GPA (3.37) than students at Avila University (3.24).
• ATU has a higher acceptance rate (95.9%) than Avila University (87.8%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.6% at ATU vs. 7.2% at Avila University.

ATU vs. Avila University Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for ATU and Avila University? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Arkansas Tech University's six-year graduation rate (43%) is higher than Avila University's (42%).
• Graduates from Avila University earn a median of about $8,000 more per year than ATU graduates about ten years after starting college ($45,100 vs. $37,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Arkansas Tech University graduates have a $8,250 lower median loan debt than Avila University graduates ($17,750 vs. $26,000).
• Among borrowers, ATU graduates have an estimated $85 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Avila University graduates ($183 vs. $268).
• More Avila University graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former ATU students, three years after graduation. (59% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.